Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2748/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2748/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 4 Mumbai v. M/S. Imfa Holding P. Ltd

High Court 29 Mar 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2748/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 4 Mumbai v. M/S. Imfa Holding P. Ltd
Date of order
29 Mar 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/2748/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 4 Mumbai v. M/S. Imfa Holding P. Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In the circumstances, the appeal of the Revenue does not raise any substantial question of law and is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.730 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. IMFA Holding P. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mrs. Padma Divakar for appellant. Ms. R. Roy i/b. Roys Law Firm for respondent. CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 29TH MARCH, 2010 P.C. :- 1.Office objections are waived. Registry is directed to number the appeal. 2.The Tribunal has dismissed the appeal filedby the Revenue against the deletion of a penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (A). The Tribunal has observed that the basis of the imposition of the penalty was a claim towards bad debts in the amount of Rs.24.97 lakhs which had been disallowed by the Assessing Officer. However, in the quantum appeal, the Tribunal by its order dated 11[th] October, 2006 set aside the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer. In these circumstances, by the impugned order the Tribunal held that as a result of the order passed in the quantum appeal, the basis for the levy of a penalty did not exist. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue states that the appeal filed before this Court against the decision of the Tribunal in the quantum appeal has been dismissed and in the circumstances, the disallowance which was made by the Assessing Officer stands deleted. In view of the statement which has been made on behalf of the Revenue, it appears that the basis for the imposition of penalty does not survive. In the circumstances, the appeal of the Revenue does not raise any substantial question of law and is accordingly dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan