Itxa/276/2006 Of Commissionser Of Income-Tax,Mum-City-23.` v. M/S Polymers Processors
High Court
25 Jun 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/276/2006 Of Commissionser Of Income-Tax,Mum-City-23.` v. M/S Polymers Processors
Date of order
25 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/276/2006 Of Commissionser Of Income-Tax,Mum-City-23.` v. M/S Polymers Processors, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD SHEET CONTINUATIONIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION.
INCOME TAX APPEAL No.276 of 2006. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office: Court or Judge’s Order.Memorandum of Coram:apperance,Court’s:Orders & Directions:and Prothonotary’s:Order.:--------------------------------------------------------------------Mr Ashok Kotangale, Advocate for theAppellant.Mr A. K. Jasani, Advocate for theRespondent.
CORAM:DR.S.RADHAKRISHNANAND V.C. DAGA,JJ.DATED:25TH JUNE, 2007.1.Heard the learned counsel for theParties.2. The learned counsel for the appellant seeksleave to withdraw the above appeal. The appeal isallowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.3. Proper court fee be refunded in the aboveappeal as per rules.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue