Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2764/2009 Of Gulam Nabi R. Tanwar v...

Itxa/2764/2009 Of Gulam Nabi R. Tanwar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ward 10 (3), Mumbai And 2 Ors

High Court 04 Feb 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2764/2009 Of Gulam Nabi R. Tanwar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ward 10 (3), Mumbai And 2 Ors
Date of order
04 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/2764/2009 Of Gulam Nabi R. Tanwar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ward 10 (3), Mumbai And 2 Ors, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeals are allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2424 OF 2009 Tanwar Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/s. The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. ..Appellant. ..Respondents. WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2309 OF 2009 Farooq R. TanwarThe Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. V/s. ..Appellant. ..Respondents. WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2764 OF 2009 Gulam Nabi R, Tanwar V/s. The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. ..Appellant. ..Respondents. Mr. P.P. Pandit with Prashant P. Prabhu for appellant. Mr. Suresh Kumar for respondent. CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 4TH FEBRUARY, 2010 P.C. :- Learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeals with liberty reserved to take out appropriate proceedings, as may be permissible in law. The appeals are allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan