Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2780/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2780/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii,Mumbai v. M/S Sonnet Rrading And Investment P.ltd

High Court 01 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2780/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii,Mumbai v. M/S Sonnet Rrading And Investment P.ltd
Date of order
01 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/2780/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii,Mumbai v. M/S Sonnet Rrading And Investment P.ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: P.C. :- P.C. :- Considering the order of the Prothonotory dated 22/3/2005 and the order of this Court on 27th August, 2007, as the objections have not been removed, the appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.11 OF 2005 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.11 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Sonnet Trade & Investment Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant. Mr.J.D.Mistry i/b. Raj Darak for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- Considering the order of the Prothonotory dated 22/3/2005 and the order of this Court on 27th August, 2007, as the objections have not been removed, the appeal stands dismissed. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan