In Itxa/278/2006 Of M/S Beekaylon Industries Ltd v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 5 (5), Mumbai, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.278 OF 2006
M/s. Beekaylon Industries Ltd.
..Appellant.
V/s.
Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax
..Respondent.
Mr. Sanjiv M. Shah for appellant.Mr. Suresh Kumar for respondent.
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2010
P.C. :-
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and learned counsel for the Revenue states that the issue sought to be raised in the appeal is covered against the assessee by a Full Bench judgment of the this Court in Plastiblends India Limited V/s. Additional Commissioner of
Income Tax & others[1]. In the circumstance, the question of law framed stands answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in terms of the judgment in Plastiblends (supra). Appeal stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.