Itxa/281/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central -Iii v. Shr Vivk Talwar
High Court
07 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/281/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central -Iii v. Shr Vivk Talwar
Date of order
07 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/281/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central -Iii v. Shr Vivk Talwar, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, appeal is rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.281 OF 2008
-----------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s
appearances, Court’s orders
order or directions
-----------------------------------------------------
¦ Mr.SureshKumar with
¦ Mr.B.M.Chatterjee for the
¦ Appellant.
¦ Ms.Bina Pillai i/b Niraj Pumania
¦ for the Respondent.
¦
¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH &
¦ J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
¦ DATED:7TH AUGUST, 2008
P.C.:
Heard the learned Counsel for the
Appellant. Perused the record. The
tribunal has given cogent reasons,
specially, paragraph 5 of the order.
The tribunal has recorded a finding
of fact that the assessee has
disclosed the loans diverted to
family members in its regular books
of account and the same appeared in
the balance sheet enclosed along
with the returns filed year after
- 2 -
year. In view of this clear finding
of fact and the reasons given by the
tribunal referred to above, in our
opinion, no question of law arises.
Hence, appeal is rejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.