Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2813/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2813/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 Mumbai v. Usha Garments Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd

High Court 22 Jun 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2813/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 Mumbai v. Usha Garments Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
22 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/2813/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 Mumbai v. Usha Garments Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2813 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-8 ..Appellant. V/s. Usha Garments Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA JJ. DATED : 22ND JUNE, 2011 P.C. :- 1.This appeal is filed by the revenue against the order of the ITAT dated 26/10/2009 relating to the assessment year 2004-05. 2.Perusal of th order of the ITAT shows that the ITAT has remanded back the issue to the file of the assessing officer for fresh adjudication in the light of the order of the Special Bench decision of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Topman Exports V/s. ITO I.T.A. No.5769/ Mum/2006 & Ors. Since the ITAT has restored the matter to the file of the assessing officer, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal. However, the Special Bench decision in the case of Topman Exports (supra) has been reversed by the decision of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals reported in 328 ITR 451. In this view of the matter, we direct the assessing officer that while reconsidering the issue afresh to take into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Kalpataru Colours & Chemicals (supra). The appeal is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs. (SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan