Itxa/2814/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax , Iii Pune v. United Western Bank Ltd
High Court
22 Jun 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2814/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax , Iii Pune v. United Western Bank Ltd
Date of order
22 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/2814/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax , Iii Pune v. United Western Bank Ltd, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2814 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune
..Appellant.
V/s.
The United Wester Bank Ltd.(Now amalgamated in Industrial DevelopmentBank of India)..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Mr. S.N.Inamdar, senior Advocate with Mihir Naniwadekar for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA JJ.
DATED : 22ND JUNE, 2011
P.C. :-
1.In this case, the appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed not merits but on the ground that the revenue has not obtained clearance from the Committee on Disputes.
2.The Apex Court in the case of Electronics Corporation of India Ltd. V/s. Union of India & Ors. reported in (2011) 51 DTR 193 has held that clearance from COD is not mandatory. Hencecounsel for the
parties states that the order of the ITAT may be set aside and the appeal be restored to the file of the ITAT. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. The order of the ITAT dated 31/8/2009 in ITA No.572/PN/2009is quashed and set aside and the ITAT is directed to hear the matter on merits and in accordance with law.
3.The appeal is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs.
(SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.