Itxa/282/2002 Of M/S Saral Enterprises Iii v. The Asst.commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
17 Dec 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/282/2002 Of M/S Saral Enterprises Iii v. The Asst.commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
17 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/282/2002 Of M/S Saral Enterprises Iii v. The Asst.commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned byMEERAMEERAMAHESHMAHESHJADHAVJADHAVDate:2021.12.1810:37:45+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 281 OF 2002
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 282 OF 2002WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 202 OF 2002WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 300 OF 2002
M/s Saral Enterprises-IIT
….Appellant
V/s.
The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax…Respondents
----
Mr. A. R. Singh & Mr. Gobinda C. Mohanty i/b Mohanty & Associates for AppellantMr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ DATED : 17th DECEMBER 2021
P.C. :
1After the appeals were heard for sometime, Mr. Singh sought leave ofthe court to withdraw the appeals with a plea that the Tribunal havingrejected appellant's submissions for deduction of the interest paid on accrualbasis, appellant should be permitted to approach the authorities to claimbenefit in the year the interest amount was paid on cash basis.
2It is open to appellant to make whatever representations or file anyplea before the concerned authorities and naturally, those authorities willconsider the plea in accordance with law. We are not making any
observations or passing any directions to the authorities how such a request
should be considered or dealt with.
3Appeals dismissed as withdrawn.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.