Itxa/2831/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Mutha Founders Pvt. Ltd
High Court
22 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2831/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Mutha Founders Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
22 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/2831/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Mutha Founders Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.780 OF 2005
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.780 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Mutha Founders Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.B.M.Chatterji with P.P.Bhosale and P.S.Sahadevan for
appellant.
Mr.S.P.Kanuga for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
The appeal is in respect of the contributions
under the Provident Fund Act. There is no dispute that
full contributions were made within the grace period.
Considering this, in our opinion, the amount paid
within grace period would be within the due date and
consequently, the question of law as framed would not
arise. Appeal is accordingly disposed of.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.