Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2831/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2831/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Mutha Founders Pvt. Ltd

High Court 22 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2831/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Mutha Founders Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
22 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/2831/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Mutha Founders Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: Appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.780 OF 2005 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.780 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Mutha Founders Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.B.M.Chatterji with P.P.Bhosale and P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.S.P.Kanuga for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- The appeal is in respect of the contributions under the Provident Fund Act. There is no dispute that full contributions were made within the grace period. Considering this, in our opinion, the amount paid within grace period would be within the due date and consequently, the question of law as framed would not arise. Appeal is accordingly disposed of. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan