In Itxa/283/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. M/S. Star India P. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Both the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.282 OF 2009AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.282 OF 2009
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.283 OF 2009
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.283 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Star India P. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta i/b. P.S.Sahadevan for appellant in
both the appeals.
Mr.Poras Kaka with A.K.Jasani for respondent in both
the appeals.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 8TH APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
An appeal raising identical question has
already been dismissed by the Division Bench of this
Court by an order dated 24/3/2009 in Income Tax Appeal
No.165 of 2009 [The Commissioner of Income Tax V/s.
Star India P.Ltd.] (assesee’s own case) {unreported}.
In this view of the matter, no substantial question of
law arise in these appeals. Both the appeals are
dismissed with no order as to costs.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.