In Itxa/285/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4,Mum v. M/S Bakliwal Investments, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 285 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-4,Kolhapur.
V/s.
M/s.Bakliwal Investments.
... Appellant.
... Respondent.
Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 16th April 2009.
P.C. :----
therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to
costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.