Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/2858/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/2858/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-11,Mum v. Shri Raj Kanwar

High Court 29 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2858/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-11,Mum v. Shri Raj Kanwar
Date of order
29 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/2858/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-11,Mum v. Shri Raj Kanwar, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.2257 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax-11..Appellant Mumbai V/s. Raj Kanwar..Respondent Mr.A.D.Kango with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate, forAppellantMr.Parag S. Savla with Mr.Ajay R. Singh, Advocate,for Respondent CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATE : 29TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C. .As the Notice of Motion stands dismissed theappeal stands dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan