Itxa/288/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 32 Mumbai v. G Shoes Exports

sg IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.288 OF 2018 PrincipalCommissioner of Income Tax 31, Mumbai..Appellantv/s...G. Shoes ExportsRespondent …. Mr. Arvind Pinto, for the Appellant. Mr. Rajendra, i/b. Rajendra & Associates, for the Respondent. ….CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR & N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATE : 16 JUNE 2022 P.C:- On 18 April 2002, following order was passed: “1. Mr. Rajendra states tribunal has recalled the impugnedorder. Mr. Pinto states that the matter be stood over by oneweek to enable him to take instructions. 2. Stand over to 25[th] April, 2022.” Thereafter, on 9 June 2022, following order was passed : “Request is made on behalf of the learned Counsel forthe Appellant for adjournment. The learned Counsel for theRespondent had pointed out earlier that Tribunal hasrecalled the impugned Order and this Appeal is infructuous.If this statement is not controverted by the Appellant by thenext date, we may proceed to after the same and pass theappropriate order. 2. Stand over to 16 June 2022. 3. To be listed under the caption ‘For Direction’.” 3.The learned Counsel for the Appellant has no instructions.Accepting the statement made by the learned Counsel for theRespondent, the Appeal is disposed of. (N.R. BORKAR, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)