Case Law › High Court › Itxa/291/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/291/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-I,Nashik v. Nashik Jilha Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd

High Court 14 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

14 Oct 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Itxa/291/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-I,Nashik v. Nashik Jilha Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.291 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income-tax-I,Nashik... Appellantv/s.Nasik Jillha Sahakari Dudh UtpadakSangh Ltd... Respondent Mr.R.V.Desai, senior counsel with Mr.R.Asokan i/byMr.K.B.Rao for appellant. CORAM: R.M.LODHA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED:14thOctober, 2004 P.C. Heard.2. We do not find any legal infirmity in theimpugned order. 3. No substantial question of law arises.Dismissed in limine. (R.M.LODHA, J.)(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.