Itxa/2925/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central,Pune v. Atul Ishwardas Chordia
High Court
18 Oct 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/2925/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central,Pune v. Atul Ishwardas Chordia
Date of order
18 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/2925/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central,Pune v. Atul Ishwardas Chordia, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: In the above view, all the Appeals are disposed of in 4.Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2886 OF 2018
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)Mumbai
V/s.
Cancer Aid and Research Foundation
… Appellant
... Respondent
ALONGWITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS.
2906/2018, 2918/2018, 2921/2018, 2925/2018, 2935/2018,2946/2018, 2972/2018, 2973/2018, 2986/2018, 2990/2018,2992/2018, 2993/2018, 3011/2018, 3016/2018, 3017/2018,3020/2018, 3022/2018, 3060/2018, 3061/2018, 3071/2018,3076/2018, 3090/2018, 3096/2018, 3100/2018, and 250 /2019
Mr. Sham Walve for the Appellants in ITXA No. 2886/18, 2925/18,2990/18, 2993/18, 3011/18, 3016/18, 3017/18, 3061/18, 3096/18,3100/18 and 250/19
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellants in ITXA Nos. 2906/18,2918/18, 2921/18, 2946/18, 2972/18, 2973/18, 2992/18, 3020/18,3022/18, 3060/18, 3076/18, 3090/18.
Mr. Ashok Kotangale for the Appellant in ITXA No. 2935/18 and2986/18
Mr. Atul Jasani for the Respondents in ITXA Nos. 2886/18,2946/18, 3020/18 and 3061/18
Mr. Jas Sanghavi for the Respondents in ITXA No. 2906/18,2972/18.
Mr. P.C. Tripathi for the Respondent in ITXA No. 2925/18.
Mr. Balasaheb Yewale and Ms. Rupali Vasaikar for the Respondentsin ITXA Nos. 3011/18, 3016/18, 3017/18, 3022/18 and 250/19.
Mr. Jignesh R. Shah for the Respondent in ITXA No. 3100/18
P.C.:-
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, JJ.
DATE : 18 OCTOBER 2019.
On an earlier occasion, we had adjourned these Appeals
at the instance of the learned Counsel for the Revenue to enablethem to take instructions to withdraw these Appeals in terms ofCircular No. 17 of 2019 dated 8 August 2019 issued by the CentralBoard for Direct Taxes (CBDT).
2.Today, the learned Counsel appearing in support of theseAppeals state that in spite of their best efforts, no instructions areforthcoming from the Revenue. All of them state that the tax effectinvolved in all these Appeals is less than the threshold limit of Rs.1.00 crore provided in the CBDT Circular dated 8 August 2019.
3.terms of the above Circular.
In the above view, all the Appeals are disposed of in
4.Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
5.However, it is made clear that in case the Officers of theRevenue inform the learned Counsel for the Revenue that any ofthese Appeals are not covered by the above CBDT Circular dated 8August 2019, then the parties are at liberty to move this Court forrecall of this order in respect of those Appeals.
NITIN JAMDAR, J.
M. S. SANKLECHA, J .
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.