In Itxa/2931/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/S Great Man Synthetics Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.2491 OF 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.2491 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Great Man Synthetics Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.P.C.Tripathi i/b. A.K.Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 8TH MAY, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the revenue states that the issue
sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case ofC.I.T. V/s. Emptee Poly-Yarn P. Ltd. reported in[2008] 305 I.T.R. 309 (Bom.). In this view of the
[2008] 305 I.T.R. 309 (Bom.)
matter, no substantial question arise in this appeal.
Appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to
costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.