Itxa/293/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbaicity-I v. Bank Of America Nt And Sa
High Court
09 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/293/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbaicity-I v. Bank Of America Nt And Sa
Date of order
09 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/293/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbaicity-I v. Bank Of America Nt And Sa, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.293 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai City I, Mumbai.
v/s.
M/s. Bank of America NT & SA
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
Mr.R.V.Desai, senior counsel with Mr.K.R.Chaudharyi/by Mr.H.D.Rathod for appellant.
P.C.
Heard.
CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED:9thSeptember, 2004
2. In the memorandum of appeal, the following
question of law has been proposed:
matter of the assessee for the assessment years
1981-82, 1983-84 and 1985-86.
4. We asked the learned senior counsel for therevenue about the position of the said assessmentorders. The learned senior counsel submits thatsubsequent position is not ascertainable. Asregards the subsequent assessment years 1986-87,1987-88 and 1988-89, the learned senior counselsubmits that the applications under section 256(2)of the Income Tax Act were filed before this court
but they were rejected for non-removal of
objections.
5. It, thus, appears to us that the assessmentorders for the assessment years 1981-82 upto
1988-89 have become final. The Tribunal’s view,
therefore, cannot be faulted.
6. The appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M.LODHA,J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.