Case Law › High Court › Itxa/294/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/294/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-I, Nashik-2 v. Sakegaon Investments (P) Ltd

High Court 24 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

24 Mar 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/294/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-I, Nashik-2 v. Sakegaon Investments (P) Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 294 OF 2006Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax ... AppellantVersusSakegaon Investments (P) Ltd. ... RespondentMr.P.S. Sahadevan with Mr. Vimal Gupta for theAppellant.Ms. Beena Pillai i/by D.M. Harish & Co. forRespondent.CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009P.C.:. As the tax incidence is less than Rs. 4 lakhs oninstructions, the counsel seeks leave to withdrawthe appeal. Hence, appal dismissed as withdrawn.Refund of court fees as per rules.(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.