In Itxa/295/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. Imfa Holdings Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is,therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as tocosts.(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(V.C.DAGA J.)
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 295 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-4,Mumbai.V/s.Imfa Holdings Private Limited.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent.
... Appellant.
... Respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 16th April 2009.P.C. :----.Heard learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue. Perused appeal papers.2.Having seen the findings of fact recordedby the Tribunal, we do not see any substantialquestion of law involved in this appeal. Appeal is,therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as tocosts.(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue