Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/30/2001 Of The Director Of Income T...

Itxa/30/2001 Of The Director Of Income Tax, (Exemptions),Mumbai v. National Saferty Council

High Court 22 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/30/2001 Of The Director Of Income Tax, (Exemptions),Mumbai v. National Saferty Council
Date of order
22 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/30/2001 Of The Director Of Income Tax, (Exemptions),Mumbai v. National Saferty Council, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: (b) Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, and in law, theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal was right inholding that the activities carried out by theassessee are education activities withoutconsidering the decision of the Hon’ble SupremeCourt in Sole Trustee Lok Shikshan Trust Vs.Inc...

Decision: In the circumstances, questions of law as framed do not arise and the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.30 OF 2001The Director of Income Tax(Exemptions), Mumbai...Appellant.Vs.National Safety Council,Mumbai...Respondent.Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr. Poras Kaka with Mr. N. Doshi i/by Crawford Bayley& Co. for the Appellant.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 22nd January,2008PC :( Per R.S. Mohite, J.)1. Heard both sides.2. Two Questions of law as framed in the appeal memoare as under.(a) Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal was right in law upholdingthe order of Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) and consequently directing theAssessing Officer to allow exemption underSection 10(22) without appreciating the factthat the assessee trust is not university orother educational institute existing solely foreducational purposes? (b) Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, and in law, theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal was right inholding that the activities carried out by theassessee are education activities withoutconsidering the decision of the Hon’ble SupremeCourt in Sole Trustee Lok Shikshan Trust Vs.Income Tax Department (101 ITR 231) and SurateArt Silk Cloth Manufacturers Association (121ITR 1)?3. The questions as framed turned upon the basicquestion as to whether the income of the respondent canbe said to be "any income of a university or any other educational institution existing solely for the purpose of education and not for the purpose of profit". 4. On this question ITAT, after a detailed discussionand elaborate reasoning held that the assessee fellwithin the term "any other educational institution"within the meaning of Section 10(22) of the Income Tax Act and therefore, entitled to exemption under that provision of the Act. 5. Though, this is essentially a question of fact, wehave perused the Memorandum and Rules and Regulations ofthe Association-Assessee which is a society registeredunder the Societies Registration Act 1860 as well as Bombay Public Trust Act,1950. It appears from theMemorandum of Association that the main objects of theassessee i.e. National Safety Council appears to beeducating the public in regard to safety , protectionand health among industrial workers, to organise andconduct programmes, lectures. conferences and otheractivities for promoting free discussions on all mattersand questions relating to safety measures, proceduresand research, to conduct educational campaigns with aview to arouse and maintain public opinion and interestof the employers and workers and their support to safetyand accident prevention and to encourage all persons andother associations to adopt, institute and support safety measures and accident prevention programmes. The other objects are ancillary to the above. 6. Article-4 of the Memorandum provides that the incomeand property of the council shall be utilised solelytowards the promotion of the aims and objects of thecouncil and no part of the same shall be paid or transferred directly or indirectly by way of dividend, bonus and profit to the members of the council. 7. Rule-2 of its Rules and Regulations categoricallylays down that the council shall be an independent, non commercial, non profit making, non political and autonomous society. come within the scope of "other educational institution" as specified in Section 10(22) of the Act. the case. In the circumstances, questions of law as framed do not arise and the appeal is dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan