Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/30/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Itxa/30/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 4 v. M/S. J.m. Financial Services Pvt.ltd

High Court 15 Jul 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/30/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 4 v. M/S. J.m. Financial Services Pvt.ltd
Date of order
15 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
2007-2008
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/30/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 4 v. M/S. J.m. Financial Services Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 5.Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed, as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 30 OF 2014 The Commissioner of Income Tax-4…Appellant v/s.M/s. J.M. Financial Service Pvt. Ltd.…Respondent …. Mr. A.R. Malhotra a/w N.A. Kazi, for the Appellant.Ms. Niyati Hakani i/b Rahul Hakani, for the Respondent. ….. CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &M.S. KARNIK, J.J. DATED : 15[th] July, 2016 P.C : 1.This Appeal relates to Assessment Year 2007-2008. 2.Mr. Malhotra, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenueinvited our attention to Circular No. 21 of 2015 issued by the CentralBoard for Direct Tax dated 10[th] December, 2015. In particular, ourattention invited to paragraphs 3 and 10 therein which read as under:- “3:-Henceforth, appeals/SLPs shall no be filed in cases wherethe tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits givenhereunder:- Sameer Pg 1 of 2 Sr.Appeals in Income Tax mattersMonetary LimitNo. (in Rs.)1Before Appellate Tribunal 10,00,000/-2Before High Court 20,00,000/-3Before Supreme Court 25,00,000/- It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merelybecause the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limitsprescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to bedecided on merits of the case.” “10:-This instruction will apply retrospectively to pendingappeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Court/Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits inpara 3 above may be withdrawn/not pressed. Appeals beforethe Supreme Court will be governed by the instructions on thissubject, operative at the time when such appeal was filed.” 3.In the present case, the tax effect is Rs. 13.05 lakhs asmentioned in paragraph 10 of the Appeal Memo.mentioned in paragraph 10 of the Appeal Memo. 4.In view of the above, Mr. Malhotra, learned Counsel appearingfor the Revenue does not press the present Appeal. 5.Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed, as not pressed. 6.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules. (M.S. KARNIK, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) Sameer Pg 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan