In Itxa/3025/2010 Of The Commissionr Of Income-Tax,Mum v. M/S Mafatlal Industries Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Issue: Although four questions of law are raised by the revenue, the learned counsel for the revenue pressed only one question viz. whether the tribunal was justified in allowing deduction of the expenditure of Rs.12,53,282/- as sales promotion expenses.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
AGK
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.839 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Mafatlal Industries Limited ..Respondent.
Mr.J.S. Salyuja for the Appellant.
Ms.V.B. Patel for the Respondent.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 14TH OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C. :
1. Although four questions of law are raised
by the revenue, the learned counsel for the revenue
pressed only one question viz. whether the
tribunal was justified in allowing deduction of the
expenditure of Rs.12,53,282/- as sales promotion
expenses.
2. In the present case, the assessee had
reimbursed the expenditure incurred by Tootals
Textiles Limited, U.K. for carrying out survey and submitting a report for promotion of the products manufactured by the assessee in certain Middle East
countries. The finding recorded by the tribunal is
that the survey pertains to the existing products
of the assessee and so the expenditure pertaining
thereto are allowable expenses. The decision of
the tribunal is based on pure finding of fact and
no question of law arises from the order of the
tribunal. Hence, the appeal is rejected.
D.K. DESHMUKH, J.
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.