Case Law › High Court › Itxa/303/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/303/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S Trans Impex Pvt.ltd

High Court 07 Feb 2005 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

07 Feb 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/303/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S Trans Impex Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The learned counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal, hence the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 303 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central III, Mumbai .. Appellant V/s. M/s. Trans Impex Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai-38 .. Respondent Mr. Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant None present for the Respondent CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 07.02.2005 DATED : 07.02.2005 DATED : 07.02.2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant. The learned counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal, hence the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as per rules. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.