Itxa/304/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Aurangabad v. Gangapur S.s.k. Ltd
High Court
25 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/304/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Aurangabad v. Gangapur S.s.k. Ltd
Date of order
25 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/304/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Aurangabad v. Gangapur S.s.k. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Issue: The Commissioner of Income Tax, Aurangabad has filed this appeal under 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 stating that the following question of law arise out of the order dated 4/9/2003 of the Tribunal. " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal relying upon the Bombay...
Decision: Appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.304 OF 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.304 OF 2007
Commissioner of Income Tax, Aurangabad ..Appellant.
V/s.
Gangapur Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Ms.Poonam Bhosale for appellant.
Mr.S.N.Inamdar with A.K.Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 25TH JULY, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Aurangabad
has filed this appeal under 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 stating that the following question of law arise
out of the order dated 4/9/2003 of the Tribunal.
" Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the Tribunal
relying upon the Bombay High Court’s
decision in the case of CIT V/s. Chatrapati
SSK Ltd. (2000) (245 ITR 498) was right in
law in deleting the following additions by
holding that various funds / deposits
collected by the assessee society out of
sugarcane purchase price payable to the cane
growers are not the trading receipts of the
assessee as held by the Supreme Court in the
case of Bazpur Co-operative Sugar Factory
Ltd. (172 ITR 321) ?
i) Hutment for homeless 2,69,628/-
ii) Area Development Fund 15,45,697/-
- = : 2 : = -
iii) Chatrapati S. Maharaj
S.Nidhi 5,17,792/-
iv) Cane Development Fund 20,84,812/-
2. Counsel on both sides agree that the
question raised by the revenue is answered by the Apex
Court in the case of Sidheshwar Sahakari SakharKarkhana Ltd. V/s. C.I.T. reported in 270 I.T.R. 1.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of by
remanding the issue relating to cane development fund
and area development fund to the I.T.A.T. for fresh
consideration in the light of the decision of the Apex
Court. As regards the other items are concerned, it is
held that the same do not constitute trading receipts
of the assessee.
4. Appeal is disposed of accordingly with no
order as to costs.
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.