Case LawHigh Court › Itxa v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Incom...

Itxa v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 25 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
25 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal.

Issue: This Appeal is filed by the appellant / assessee against the order of the I.T.A.T., Pune stating that the following question of law arise out of the order of the Tribunal :- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that non refundable deposit...

Decision: Appeal is accordingly allowed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.306 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.306 OF 2007 Padmashri Dr.Vitthalrao Vikhe Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ..Appellant. V/s. The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Ms.Poonam Bhosale for appellant. Mr.S.N.Inamdar with A.K.Jasani for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 25TH JULY, 2007. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 25TH JULY, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. This Appeal is filed by the appellant / assessee against the order of the I.T.A.T., Pune stating that the following question of law arise out of the order of the Tribunal :- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that non refundable deposit and interest on non refundable deposits are income and, therefore, taxable ? " 2. Counsel on both sides agree that the aforesaid question is answered by this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax V/s. Malegaon Sahakari Commissioner of Income-Tax V/s. Malegaon SahakariSakhar Karkhana Ltd. reported in 279 of I.T.R. 19 in Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. - = : 2 : = - favour of the assessee and against the revenue. 3. In this view of the matter, the question is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. 4. Appeal is accordingly allowed with no order as to costs. (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan