Itxa v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
25 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
25 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal.
Issue: This Appeal is filed by the appellant / assessee against the order of the I.T.A.T., Pune stating that the following question of law arise out of the order of the Tribunal :- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that non refundable deposit...
Decision: Appeal is accordingly allowed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.306 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.306 OF 2007
Padmashri Dr.Vitthalrao Vikhe Patil
Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ..Appellant.
V/s.
The Dy. Commissioner of
Income Tax & Anr. ..Respondents.
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Ms.Poonam Bhosale for appellant.
Mr.S.N.Inamdar with A.K.Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 25TH JULY, 2007.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 25TH JULY, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. This Appeal is filed by the appellant /
assessee against the order of the I.T.A.T., Pune
stating that the following question of law arise out of
the order of the Tribunal :-
" Whether on the facts and in the circumstances
of the case, the Tribunal was justified in
holding that non refundable deposit and interest
on non refundable deposits are income and,
therefore, taxable ? "
2. Counsel on both sides agree that the aforesaid
question is answered by this Court in the case of
Commissioner of Income-Tax V/s. Malegaon Sahakari
Commissioner of Income-Tax V/s. Malegaon SahakariSakhar Karkhana Ltd. reported in 279 of I.T.R. 19 in
Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
- = : 2 : = -
favour of the assessee and against the revenue.
3. In this view of the matter, the question is
answered in favour of the assessee and against the
revenue.
4. Appeal is accordingly allowed with no order
as to costs.
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.