In Itxa/309/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, Mumbai v. Indian Resort Hotels Ltd. , Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with no order as to cost.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 3166 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax-,
... Appellant.
V/s.
The Indian Resort Hotels Ltd.... Respondent.
Kaushik Sochannam i/b. Ajit Shah for the respondent.
CORAM :V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 7[th] July 2009.
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
The delay in filing appeal is about 2,044 days. Admittedly no notice of motion is taken out for condonation of delay. No material facts and particulars are to be found in support of the prayer for condonation of delay. As no sufficient cause is made out, we have no option but to dismiss the appeal as barred by limitation.
Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with no order as to cost.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue