Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/310/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/310/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Vi. Bombay v. Sandoz (I) Ltd

High Court 17 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/310/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Vi. Bombay v. Sandoz (I) Ltd
Date of order
17 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/310/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Vi. Bombay v. Sandoz (I) Ltd, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 310 OF 2002 The Commissioner of Income-tax,Mumbai City-VI, Mumbai... Appellant v/s. Sandoz (India) Ltd... Respondent Mr.K.R.Chaudhary i/by Mr.H.D.Rathod for appellant. Mr. Nitesh Joshi i/by M/s. Kanga & Co. forrespondent. CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED:17thAugust, 2004 P.C. Heard. 2. In the memorandum of appeal, two substantial questions of law have been proposed viz. ITR 275. In view thereof, the decision of the Tribunal on this aspect cannot be faulted. 4. As regards the proposed question No.2, thelearned counsel for the revenue conceded that thisquestion is concluded by the Division Benchjudgment of this court in the case of Commissionerof Income-Tax v. Allana Sons Pvt.Ltd., 216 ITR 690. The view of the Tribunal on this aspect also, therefore, cannot be faulted. 5. No substantial question of law arises. Appeal is dismissed. (R.M.LODHA, J.)(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan