In Itxa/3150/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Esteem Textiles Trading Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1210 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Esteem Textiles Trading Pvt. Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for appellant.
Mr. J.D. Mistry with P.C. Tripathi i/b. Raj Darak for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 4TH AUGUST, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the parties. Office objections are overruled Registry is directed to register the appeal. Appeal is taken up for hearing at the request of the parties.
2.Learned counsel for appearing for the revenue fairly stated that the issue sought to be raised in the appeal is covered by the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Appollo Tyres Ltd. V/s. CIT reported in [2002] 255 ITR 273. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.