Itxa/319/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-,10,Mum v. M/S Filtech Pharmablab Pvt Ltd
High Court
28 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/319/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-,10,Mum v. M/S Filtech Pharmablab Pvt Ltd
Date of order
28 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/319/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-,10,Mum v. M/S Filtech Pharmablab Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
AGK
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.319 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-8 ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Filtech Pharmalab Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh kumar for the Appellant.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 28TH AUGUST, 2008.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for both the sides.
2. So far as first question of law in
relation to the provisions of Section 260A is
concerned, the appeal cannot be entertained in view
of the order dated 12-3-2008 passed in Income Tax
Appeal No.11 of 2007.
3. So far as second question of law is
concerned, it is obvious from the order of the
tribunal that the order has been passed on
agreement between the parties. The appeal cannot
be entertained. Hence, rejected.
D.K. DESHMUKH, J.
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue