Itxa/321/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income- Tax, City-V, Mumbai v. M/S. Central Automobiles Pvt. Ltd
High Court
24 Jan 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/321/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income- Tax, City-V, Mumbai v. M/S. Central Automobiles Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
24 Jan 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/321/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income- Tax, City-V, Mumbai v. M/S. Central Automobiles Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.321 OF 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.321 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Central Automobiles P.Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.R.V.Desai, senior counsel with Pankaj Kapoor for
appellant.
CORAM : S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 24TH JANUARY, 2005.
CORAM : S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 24TH JANUARY, 2005.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
Perused the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Mumbai Bench ‘H’, Mumbai dated 24th October, 2002. In
paragraph 2 of thereof, it is categorically mentioned that
there was force in the contention of the assessee that the
expenditure was wholly and exclusively laid out for the
purpose of business for promotion and to earn profit. The
commission was paid almost 15 years back and the same was
always accepted by the department in the past. Under
these circumstances, there is no substantial question of
law involved in this appeal. Hence appeal stands
dismissed.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.