Case Law › High Court › Itxa/322/2006 Of Comm. Of Income Tax v....

Itxa/322/2006 Of Comm. Of Income Tax v. Hercules Investment Pvt. Ltd

High Court 01 Aug 2006 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

01 Aug 2006

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Itxa/322/2006 Of Comm. Of Income Tax v. Hercules Investment Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 322 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax, ... AppellantCity-III, Mumbai. V/s. M/s. Hercules Investment Ltd., ... Respondent Mr. A.N. Kotangale for the appellant.Mr. J.D. Mistry with Mr. Raj Darak for respondent. CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &V.R. KINGAONKAR,JJ.DATED : 1st August, 2006 P.C..The demand involved in this matter is lessthan Rs. 2 lacs. We do not entertain this appeal inview of the C.B.D.T. circular. Hence, the appeal isrejected. [H.L. GOKHALE, J.] [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.