Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/322/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/322/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)-1 v. M/S. Avenue Supermarts Pvt. Ltd

High Court 14 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/322/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)-1 v. M/S. Avenue Supermarts Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
14 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/322/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)-1 v. M/S. Avenue Supermarts Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 5.In the above view, all the three appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 322 OF 2016WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 324 OF 2016WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 514 OF 2016 The Commissioner of Income Tax(TDS)-1.. Appellant v/s. M/s. Avenue Supermarts Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent Mr. A.R. Malhotra a/w Mr. N.A. Kazi for the appellant Mr. Pankaj Toprani I/b PRH Juris Consults for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J. P.C. DATED : 14[th] AUGUST, 2018. 1.Not on board. Mentioned Income Tax Appeal No. 514 of 2014. 2.The Income Tax Appeal No. 514 of 2014 to be taken up along with other two appeals which are on board today, arising from thecommon impugned order dated 9[th] April, 2015 of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal. 3.All the three appeals by the Revenue challenging the common impugned order dated 9[th] April, 2015 passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal relating to Assessment Years 2008-09, 2009-10 and2010-11. The issue arising in all these appeals is with regard to theapplicability of the TDS provision under Section 194-I of the Act inrespect of the payment made of premium for acquisition of long termlease. 4.Mr. Malhotra, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue statesthat in view of the CBDT Circular No.35 of 2016 dated 13[th] October,2016, he has been instructed to withdraw all the three appeals. 5.In the above view, all the three appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn. Refund of Court fees as per Rules. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan