In Itxa/323/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 3 , Mumbai v. Nasik Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. ,Mumbai, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
The Commissioner of Income-tax-,
... Appellant.
Nasik Enterprises Pvt.Ltd.
... Respondent.
P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
Heard. Office objections are overruled. Appeal is taken up for hearing at the request of the appellant.
2.The question sought to be raised in this appeal relates to reassessment of the assessment after lapse of four years. The Tribunal after appreciating material and evidence before it held that there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose the primary fact for completion of the assessment. The Tribunal has, thus, rightly canceled reassessment proceeding. Considering the findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal, we see no substantial question of law involved in this appeal. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.