Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/324/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/324/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Matushree Textiles Ltd

High Court 07 Feb 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/324/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Matushree Textiles Ltd
Date of order
07 Feb 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/324/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Matushree Textiles Ltd, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the Tribunal has merely remanded back the matter to the Assessing Officer to decide the matter afresh, there is no substantial question of law in the above, hence the Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 324 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai .. Appellant V/s. M/s. Matushree Textiles Ltd., Mumbai .. Respondent Mr. R.V. Desai for the Appellant None present for the Respondent CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 07.02.2005 DATED : 07.02.2005 DATED : 07.02.2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant. Perused the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 31.7.2003. As the Tribunal has merely remanded back the matter to the Assessing Officer to decide the matter afresh, there is no substantial question of law in the above, hence the Appeal stands dismissed. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan