Case Law › High Court › Itxa/326/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/326/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-I, Mumbai v. M/S Mafatla Dyes And Chem Ltd

High Court 28 Nov 2005 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

28 Nov 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/326/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-I, Mumbai v. M/S Mafatla Dyes And Chem Ltd, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.325 OF 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.325 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.325 OF 2004 AND AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.326 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.326 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.326 OF 2004 The Commissioner ofIncome-Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Mafatlal Dyes & Chem Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Ashok Kotangale for appellant in both the appeals. None for respondent. CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 28TH NOVEMBER, 2005. DATED : 28TH NOVEMBER, 2005. P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard Mr.Kotangale in support of both the appeals. Since identical matter bearing Income Tax Appeal No.282 of 2000 has been dismissed. No reason to entertain these appeals also. The same are dismissed. (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.