Case Law › High Court › Itxa/3266/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/3266/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ix v. M/S Rachna Builders Pvt.ltd

High Court 24 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

24 Jul 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/3266/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ix v. M/S Rachna Builders Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2808 OF 2004WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1143 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Rachna Builders P. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Ashok Kotangale i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for appellant. Mr.A.P.Sathe, senior counsel with Mandar Vaidya for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2007. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- As the tax effect is less than Rs.4 lakhs, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the motion and also the appeal. Motion and the appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court fees as per rules. Certified copy expedited. (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.