Itxa/3301/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Vi v. M/S Avtarsingh & Co Pvt.ltd
High Court
05 Jun 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3301/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Vi v. M/S Avtarsingh & Co Pvt.ltd
Date of order
05 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/3301/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Vi v. M/S Avtarsingh & Co Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.879 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.288 of 2004ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.OF 2004The Commissioner of Income Tax VIMumbai.. AppellantvsM/s Avtarsingh & Co Pvt.Ltd .. RespondentMs.P.P.Bhosale for AppellantMs.A.Visajee i.b S.J.Mehta for RespondentCORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJDATE : 5th June, 2007P.C.1. In view of withdrawal of the appeal, motion hasbecome infructuous.(V.C.Daga, J)(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and forthe respondent. Learned counsel for the appellant
seeks leave to withdraw the appeal.
2. Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
2. Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
3. Permissible court fees be refunded to theappellant as per rules.
(V.C.Daga, J)(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue