Itxa/330/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aurangabad v. Gangapur S.s.s.k. Ltd. Gangapur Dist. A Bad
High Court
25 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/330/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aurangabad v. Gangapur S.s.s.k. Ltd. Gangapur Dist. A Bad
Date of order
25 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/330/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aurangabad v. Gangapur S.s.s.k. Ltd. Gangapur Dist. A Bad, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Issue: The Commissioner of Income Tax, Aurangabad has filed this appeal under 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 stating that the following question of law arise out of the order dated 10/2/2006 of the Tribunal. " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holdin...
Decision: Appeal is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.330 OF 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.330 OF 2007
Commissioner of Income Tax, Aurangabad ..Appellant.
V/s.
Gangapur Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Ms.Poonam Bhosale for appellant.
Mr.S.N.Inamdar with A.K.Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 25TH JULY, 2007.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 25TH JULY, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Aurangabad
has filed this appeal under 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 stating that the following question of law arise
out of the order dated 10/2/2006 of the Tribunal.
" Whether on the facts and in the circumstances
of the case, the Tribunal was justified in
holding that non refundable deposit and interest
on non refundable deposits are income and,
therefore, taxable ? "
2. Counsel on both sides agree that the aforesaid question is answered by this Court in the case ofCommissioner of Income-Tax V/s. Malegaon Sahakari
Commissioner of Income-Tax V/s. Malegaon Sahakari
Commissioner of Income-Tax V/s. Malegaon Sahakari
Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. reported in 279 of I.T.R. 19 in
favour of the assessee and against the revenue.
- = : 2 : = -
3. In this view of the matter, the question is
answered in favour of the assessee and against the
revenue.
4. Appeal is accordingly disposed of with no
order as to costs.
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.