Case Law › High Court › Itxa/331/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/331/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-City-6,Mum v. M/S Samist Properties Pvt.ltd

High Court 02 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

02 Jun 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/331/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-City-6,Mum v. M/S Samist Properties Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: RespondentsCORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNANAND A.P.BHANGALE,JJDATED: JUNE 2, 2008P.C.:-1.None appears for the Appellant.2.Appeal stands dismissed in default.(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J)(A.P.BHANGALE,J.)

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.331 of 2005The Commissioner of Income Tax8, Mumbai .... AppellantV/sM/s Seamist Properties Pvt.Ltd.. RespondentsCORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNANAND A.P.BHANGALE,JJDATED: JUNE 2, 2008P.C.:-1.None appears for the Appellant.2.Appeal stands dismissed in default.(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J)(A.P.BHANGALE,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.