Itxa/333/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9, Mumbai v. M/S Phase Holding Pvt. Ltd
High Court
20 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/333/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9, Mumbai v. M/S Phase Holding Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
20 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/333/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9, Mumbai v. M/S Phase Holding Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the Appeal is not maintainable and is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
rpa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 333 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 333 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 333 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax-9 .. Appellant
V/s.
M/s.Phase Holding Pvt.Ltd.,Mumbai .. Respondent
Mr.Vinod Gupta for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND
P.C.:-
P.C.:-
. This Appeal is filed by the Department against an
order by the Appellate Tribunal dated 23rd December, 2005 in an Appeal against the said order. The question of law framed in paragraph 4(a) by the department is as
under :
a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances
of the case the Hon’ble Tribunal was right in
rejecting the appeal of the department on the
2
assumption that the valuation is done by the
department was purely on estimate basis when
in fact the valuation is done on the basis of
material supplied by the assessee and the same
is based on various submissions / details
furnished by the assessee.
2. We have gone through the records. We have also
heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Department
and we find that there is no question of law involved,
as a matter of fact question relate to amounts that
were spent by the assessee for the construction. The
department did not produce the books of account,
estimated value on the basis of information received by
the department either from the assessee or from the
other sources.
3. In this view of the matter, the Appeal is not
maintainable and is dismissed.
(BILAL NAZKI, J.)
(BILAL NAZKI, J.)
(S.S.SHINDE, J.)
(S.S.SHINDE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.