In Itxa/3333/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -6, Mumbai v. Amma Lines Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 541/2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 549/2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 558/2018 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 559/2018
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 560/2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.561/2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 562/2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 563/2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 565/2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 567/2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 569/2018WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 570/2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 571/2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 572/2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 573/2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 575/2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 576/2018
O R D E R
Perused Praecipe and contents mentioned therein. Heard learned Counsel. On considering contents of Praecipe, time to remove office objections on aforesaid matter, if not dismissed/rejected, is further extended for period of 8 weeks, failing matter to stand rejected under the provision of O.S. Rule, 986.
Date : 07/09/2018
Prothonotary and Senior Master
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue