In Itxa/3334/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. M/S. G.l. Constructions Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 321/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1170/2017WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1171/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1457/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1544/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1603/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1621/2017WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1622/2017
O R D E R
Perused Praecipe and contents mentioned therein. Heard learned Counsel. On considering contents of Praecipe, time to remove office objections on aforesaid matter, if not dismissed/rejected, is further extended for period of 8 weeks again as a last chance, failing matter to stand rejected under the provision of O.S. Rule, 986.
Date : 30/10/2018
Prothonotary and Senior Master
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue