Itxa/3359/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 Mumbai v. Deepak C. Mehta
High Court
27 Jul 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3359/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 Mumbai v. Deepak C. Mehta
Date of order
27 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/3359/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 Mumbai v. Deepak C. Mehta, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3359 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-5, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Deepak C. Mehta
..Respondent.
Ms. Anamika Malhotra for the appellant.
Mr. J.D. Mistri, senior Advocate with A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 27TH JULY, 2011
P.C. :-
1.Counsel for the revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal with a view to move the ITAT seeking modification of the order passed by the ITAT. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs.
2.It will be open to the revenue to move the ITAT seeking modification of the order, if permissible in law.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue