Case Law › High Court › Itxa/342/2002 Of Synco Industries Ltd v....

Itxa/342/2002 Of Synco Industries Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,And Ors

High Court 11 Jan 2005 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

11 Jan 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/342/2002 Of Synco Industries Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,And Ors, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.342 OF 2002 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.342 OF 2002 Synco Industries Ltd. ..Appellant. V/s. Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.P. Sanchayati for appellant. Mr.R.V.Desai, senior counsel for respondents. CORAM : S.RADHAKRISHNAN ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 11TH JANUARY, 2005. CORAM : S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 11TH JANUARY, 2005. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for appellant. The issue involved in the present appeal is covered by the Judgment of our High Court in the case of Synco Synco Industries (formerly known as Synco Textiles P.Ltd. Industries (formerly known as Synco Textiles P.Ltd.V/s. Asessing Officer of Income-Tax and Ors. reported254 I.T.R. 608 Bombay. In view thereof, appeal V/s. Asessing Officer of Income-Tax and Ors. in 254 I.T.R. 608 Bombay. stands dismissed. 2. The learned counsel for appellant states that the matter is pending in the Supreme Court. (S.RADHAKRISHNAN, (S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.