Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/343/2016 Of Principal Commissioner...

Itxa/343/2016 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 Mumbai v. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd

High Court 07 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/343/2016 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 Mumbai v. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
07 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/343/2016 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 Mumbai v. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Rane IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 343 OF 2016 The Pr. Commissioner of IncomeTax-Pune-10….Appellant V/s.Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. ….Respondent * * * * Mr. Arvind Pinto, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Sameer Dalal, Advocate for the respondent. -CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA, & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ. TUESDAY, 7TH AUGUST, 2018. P.C. : 1. This Appeal relates to Assessment Year2009-10. 2. Mr. Pinto, Learned Counsel appearing for theRevenue invited our attention to Circular No.3 of 2018dated 11[th] July, 2018 issued by the Central Board for Rane 2/2ITXA—343-2016 (SR.47)7.8.2018 Direct Tax (CBDT). The above Circular directs theOfficers of the Revenue not to file appeals to the HighCourt where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs.It also directs its Officers to withdraw/not press itspending appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs.50lakhs. This, of course, if it does not fall in the excludedclass of appeals listed therein. 3. In view of the Circular No.3 of 2018 dated11[th] July, 2018 issued by the CBDT, Mr. Pinto, LearnedCounsel appearing for the Revenue, on instructions ofMr. Manojkumar Mishra, Deputy Commissioner ofIncome-Tax, seeks to withdraw this Appeal. 4. Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn. 5. Refund of court-fees as per Rules. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J) Digitally signedNeetaby NeetaShaileshShaileshSawantDate:Sawant2018.08.0912:15:11 +0530
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan