In Itxa/3448/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iii Pune v. Ajinkyatara Sah Sakhar Karhana Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3448 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-III..Appellant.
V/s.
Ajinkyatara SSK Ltd...Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA JJ.DATED : 29TH JUNE, 2011
P.C. :-
Counsel for the parties state that similar questions raised by the revenue in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Kolhapur V/s. Shree Datta Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. [Income Tax Appeal (Lod) No.1824 of 2009] decided on 6th August, 2009 has been dismissed. Hence the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue