In Itxa/346/2006 Of Zarhas Laxmi Trading Private Limited,Mum v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 (6) Mum, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 346 OF 2006
Zarhas Laxmi Trading Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai .. Appellant
v/s.
Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax-3(6)Mumbai ..Respondent
Mr. Atul Jasani for the appellant Mr. Ashok Kotangle a/w Mr. A.K. Saxena for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 1[st] AUGUST, 2018.
1.Mr. Jasani, learned Counsel appearing in support of the appeal,
on instructions, seeks to withdraw this appeal.
2.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Digitallysigned byUdayUday ShivajiJagtapShivajiDate:2018.08.16Jagtap17:04:55+0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue