In Itxa/347/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Nashik v. Krishi Uttpanna Bazar Samiti, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: DEVADHAR JJ.DATE : 5TH SEPTEMBER 2008 P.C.- 1.The question raised in this appeal is covered view of the matter, there is no merit in this appeal.Appeal is dismissed. .
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.347 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-1,Nashik...Appellantv/sKrishi Uttapanna Bazar SamitiNashik ...Respondents
Mr Vimal Gupta for Appellant.
None for Respondents.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND J.P. DEVADHAR JJ.DATE : 5TH SEPTEMBER 2008
P.C.-
1.The question raised in this appeal is covered
view of the matter, there is no merit in this appeal.Appeal is dismissed.
.
Parties to act on the copy of this order duly
authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary ofthe Court.
.
Certified copy is expedited.
( D.K. DESHMUKH J.)
( J.P. DEVADHAR J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue