Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/348/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/348/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-I-Pune v. Arlabs Limited

High Court 18 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/348/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-I-Pune v. Arlabs Limited
Date of order
18 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/348/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-I-Pune v. Arlabs Limited, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 348 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-IPune v/s. Arlabs Ltd. .. Appellant ..Respondent None for the appellantNone for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J. P.C. DATED : 18[th] JULY, 2018. 1.When this appeal was called out earlier, none appeared in support of the appeal. Therefore, the appeal was kept back. On beingcalled the second time also, none appeared in support of the appeal. 2.It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting thepresent appeal. This is more particularly so as the parties andadvocates were put to notice on 6[th] June, 2018 that this appeal would be taken up for consideration today. 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan